I often say that pharmacies that bring legal actions against PBMs do not have a good precedent to rely on. Things might be changing soon with a recent California case holding that Optum’s provider agreement is unconscionable and thus unenforceable (specifically, its arbitration clause).
The court noted that the search for the true meaning of

The announced Medi-Cal Rx implementation date, which was initially set for April 1, 2021, is postponed. (See
If you are into pharmacy technology, you might have heard of a new pharmacy software designed to optimize profitability –
The news are full of excitement regarding a recent US Supreme court decision in Rutledge v PCMA. But there is still lots of confusion what this decision means for independent pharmacies.
Currently, California pharmacies must report dispensing of Schedules II-IV to CURES (California’s PDMP database) “as soon as reasonably possible, but no more than 7 days after a controlled substance is dispensed.”
Every healthcare provider has at least one problematic patient who demands extra attention. Some of these patients continue to cause troubles even after they are “discharged.” A recent case coming from Utah illustrates this.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued an amendment to the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA) allowing pharmacies to perform vaccination to children ages three through 18 as per ACIP’s standard immunization schedule.
Recently, we have seen many cases filed by whistleblowers against pharmacies for not properly reporting their Usual-and-Customary Drug Prices (U&C). The cases are usually filed under the False Claims Act (FCA) for manipulating U&C to receive greater reimbursements from government payors.
Many pharmacy owners wonder if contracting with Medicare directly (as a Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (“DMEPOS”) provider) adds value to a pharmacy business. The answer depends on whether the sale of the pharmacy is structured as an asset or a stock purchase.
A group of independent pharmacies filed a lawsuit against OptumRx alleging various unfair/illegal business practices, such as reimbursements below cost, price manipulations, discriminatory treatment. Mark Cuker of the Jacobson Law Group filed the case in Pennsylvania and Illinois on behalf of independent pharmacies, and he is looking into filing a similar action in California.